Advice on the subject of marriage
What the registrar won’t tell you
A marriage is often a special moment in the life of a couple, the families and friends involved, filled with happiness and gratitude at having found the right partner in life and with plans for the future together. Few people think at such moments that by concluding a marriage they are entering into a (highly personal) legal transaction that already has legal consequences during the marriage.
Couples in love do not usually think about the fact that in the event of separation or divorce, the law provides for specific rights and obligations for both spouses, which can be enforced in court. For example, the law requires the spouse with the greater income or assets to make alimony payments to the other spouse after the separation and, often, for a considerable period of time after the divorce, to compensate the other spouse for the increase in assets realized during the marriage (equalisation of gains) and to share the pension entitlements gained during the marriage with the other spouse (pension splitting).
Conversely, anyone who decides to give up its job during the marriage, for example, to devote herself or himself entirely to childcare and housework, may fail to recognise how difficult it will be to return to work in the event of a divorce, as required by law, and the financial dependence they will be entering into. Couples also do not necessarily build up wealth jointly during the marriage, and this would also be associated with tax risks.
The family maintenance can be arranged relatively freely during the marriage. The non-working spouse has no claim to half of the other spouse’s income and certainly no right to continued payment of their previous income by the other spouse.
No institutionalised information system
When people get married, there is no institutionalised information system to educate the couple about the legal consequences of marriage. Neither the registry offices nor other state agencies or the churches offer such information, although the legal consequences for those involved are usually much more serious than in the area of data protection or distance selling law, for example, where the law provides for mandatory information.
Many spouses are therefore unaware of what rules actually apply in the event of a divorce, nor that they can effectively amend these legal consequences by entering into a notarised marriage agreement.
The importance of marriage agreements
It is not uncommon for the parents of the bride and groom to push for the conclusion of prenuptial agreements with regard to existing family assets. This can be done indirectly through reversion or revocation clauses in real estate gift contracts.
Alternatively, the articles of association of companies in which a spouse has a share may stipulate that the shareholders are obliged to enter into marriage agreements in which the respective share in the company is excluded from the equalisation of accrued gains; otherwise, there is a risk of exclusion from the company (so-called matrimonial property clauses).
In such situations, the spouses are externally pressured into concluding a marriage agreement with the aim of preserving existing family or company assets and protecting them from the access of the other spouse.
However, it is generally recommended that all couples get information from a specialist lawyer in family law about the legal consequences of divorce, in particular alimony payments, equalisation of gains and pension splitting, before or even after the wedding, and then decide together whether they want to leave it at these rules or whether more appropriate individual arrangements should be made instead in the form of a marriage agreeement.
Some may find this unromantic. However, in the end both spouses benefit from a prenuptual marriage agreement because in the event of a divorce the financial consequences are already clearly regulated and a war of the roses can be avoided.
Legal consequences of marriage
If an individual marriage agreement is not concluded, the following principles apply by law:
Anyone who marries in Germany without a prenuptial agreement lives in the statutory matrimonial property regime of the community of accrued gains. This means that each spouse retains and alone manages the assets that it had at the time of marriage, and newly acquired assets also remain separate assets. Only when the marriage ends through divorce (or death) does equalisation take place for unequal increases in wealth during the marriage in the form of so-called equalisation of gains.
Conversely, the separation of assets means that one spouse is generally not liable for the debts of the other spouse, unless they have expressly undertaken to be liable or the debt is for a transaction to cover the family’s reasonable living expenses (so-called agency implied in fact).
Another legal consequence of the statutory matrimonial property regime of community of accrued gains is the two-fold restriction on the execution of certain legal transactions:
A spouse who wishes to dispose of its assets as a whole requires the consent of the other spouse. This is particularly relevant if major assets that constitute the main assets of the spouse, such as real estate or company shares, are to be sold. In such cases, the consent of the other spouse and their signature on the notarised transfer deed are required.
The same applies to the disposal of household items. Such dispositions are also initially ineffective without the consent of the other spouse; they only become effective once consent has been granted.
Spouses owe each other appropriate alimony. This applies from the time of wedding, but also if the parties separate and even often after divorce. The maintenance claim takes on different forms depending on the phase of the marriage.
During the marriage, the claim refers to covering the costs of the household and the personal needs of the spouses and the living expenses of their children. The maintenance obligation applies to all marriage models and types of families. Those who do not work in the marriage, for example, because they take care of children and the household, are entitled to a certain pocket money.
Even in the event of separation, the higher-earning spouse continues to owe the other maintenance, which is generally based on the principle of half-division. Particularly if couples have significant income, the higher income spouse is often surprised at how high the maintenance claim can actually be, especially if the other spouse up to this point has been given only limited money.
Under certain circumstances, maintenance may continue to be owed even after a final divorce, although the principle of half-division also applies here. Circumstances that may give rise to a maintenance obligation after divorce include caring for joint children, unemployment, or even old age or illness. The most common form of maintenance is the so-called top-up maintenance, which enables the (now) working ex-spouse to maintain the previous standard of living for a while after the divorce.
If one of the spouses was not gainfully employed during the marriage, for example, because it was caring for the couple’s children, that spouse is obliged to take up gainful employment at the latest when the divorce petition is filed. If that spouse is still living in the former marital home at that time, it must have the full objective residential value (rent value) added to its income. In some cases, there is then no longer any entitlement to cash maintenance.
Pension entitlements acquired during a marriage belong to the person who has acquired them. If one of the spouses dies, the other may be entitled to a widow(er)’s pension.
In the event of divorce, the family court carries out the so-called pension splitting. It first finds out from the participating pension providers which pension entitlements the spouses have each acquired during the marriage (from the time of their wedding to the time of the divorce petition being served). Those parts of each individual pension entitlement of each spouse that were acquired during the marriage time are then divided equally between the spouses by the pension providers at the instruction of the court as part of the divorce.
If no pension payments are being made yet, but only entitlements exist, then only rebookings are carried out, either within the pension providers themselves by opening a separate pension account for the spouse (so-called internal division) or by transferring the transfer amount of the entitlement to another pension provider (so-called external division). Only when retirement age is reached will the beneficiary spouse benefit from the increase in pension.
If, on the other hand, a spouse is already receiving a pension when the couple divorces, the pension splitting will reduce the spouse´s monthly pension by half, even if the other spouse has not yet reached retirement age (elimination of the pensioner privilege).
Spouses have a statutory right of inheritance along with other relatives of the deceased, and in the event of disinheritance, a claim to a compulsory portion. The inheritance share or the amount of the claim to a compulsory portion depends on whether the deceased spouse leaves children or other relatives at their death and on the matrimonial property regime under which the spouses lived.
If the deceased had already filed for divorce or agreed to the other spouse’s divorce petition before its death, the surviving spouse loses its inheritance rights and right to a compulsory portion.
Since 1 January 2023, spouses have been legally entitled to represent the other spouse to doctors and clinics in the event of unconsciousness or illness and to inspect the other spouse’s medical records. To this extent, the treating physicians are released from their duty of confidentiality.
This does not apply if the spouses live separately or if the ill spouse objects to the representation or if a guardian has been appointed for the ill spouse.
If children are born during a marriage, the parents have joint custody of them by operation of law. This also applies if the biological father of the child is actually another man.
If there are joint children already before the marriage, joint parental responsibility for the children arises upon marriage, unless joint declarations of custody have already been made by the parents beforehand.
From a tax point of view, marriage is generally favourable for couples. In addition to the advantages of joint taxation in the context of the now politically controversial income tax splitting for married couples, which privileges married couples over those who are not married, inheritance tax, gift tax and land transfer tax law also provide for privileges in favour of spouses in the context of existing tax-free allowances and lower tax rates.
In the event of death, the surviving spouse is also entitled to a so-called tax-free allowance for inheritance tax.
The family home is also exempt from inheritance tax if the spouse continues to live in it for ten years. During the lifetime of the owner, the owner-occupied family home can be transferred to the other spouse free of gift tax. If a property is sold between spouses, the land transfer tax does not apply.
Spouses and children can be co-insured with no contributions within the statutory health insurance as long as they are not required to have health insurance themselves and a certain level of total income is not exceeded. A similar rule applies to the subsidy for civil servants.
Contents of marriage agreements
The statutory system of divorce consequences is based on an understanding of marriage as a community of solidarity. The aim of the regulations is to protect the economically weaker spouse after the marriage has ended and thus indirectly to protect the social systems. During the marriage, the arrangement of the conjugal living conditions is largely left to the spouses themselves. In many cases, the legal regulations regarding the consequences of divorce lead to acceptable results.
However, the legal system is less suitable or not suitable at all for some marriage constellations. This applies, for example, to
The number of possible constellations is almost unlimited and cannot be presented here in any way approaching exhaustiveness. In many of these cases, the desired modification of the legal consequences can be brought about by means of a prenuptual agreement. In the case of entrepreneurial marriages, the conclusion of a marriage agreement is almost mandatory.
Judicial review of the content of marriage agreements
Prenuptial and postnuptual agreements are generally subject to judicial review of their content, whereby a distinction is made between the so-called effectiveness review at the time the contract is concluded and the exercise review at the time the contractual provisions are given effect. The courts have to correct such agreements that lead to a recognisably one-sided distribution of burdens if this is an expression of a disturbed contractual parity. This is how the Federal Constitutional Court ruled in 2001. There is now a comprehensive body of case law on this, which must be taken into account when drafting prenuptial agreements and postnuptual agreements. In this respect, too, legal advice should always be sought when concluding prenuptial agreements.
Legal advice on the drafting of marriage agreements
Marriage agreements almost always require notarisation to become legally effective. However, since family lawyers are generally more familiar with the subject matter and have greater expertise, the agreement are usually drafted by family lawyers who have carefully reviewed the individual situation of the couple and the wishes of both spouses before. Family lawyers are also familiar with the statutory prohibitions on certain types of agreements (e.g. a waiver of separation alimony) and the extensive case law on the effectiveness of prenuptial agreements.
A lawyer may not represent both parties to a marriage agreement due to conflicting interests. Rather, the lawyer must clearly point out which party it represents already in the initial consultation, which often takes place with both fiancés/spouses. In case of doubt, the other spouse is well advised to seek its own, partial legal advice in a timely fashion.
In order to avoid undesirable tax effects of marriage agreements, in particular with regard to changes in the matrimonial property regime, a tax law expert should also timely be brought on board.